The following statement was issued today (March 10) by Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C., president of the University of Notre Dame:
In the spring of 2006, prompted by recurring performances ofThe Vagina Monologueson campus, I made a speech to the Notre Dame family that launched a 10-week-long, community-wide discussion about the presentation of controversial events at Notre Dame.At the end of that exchange, I drew several conclusions, which were shared by department chairs in the College of Arts and Letters and expressed inThe Common Proposal of the Chairs of Arts and Letters and Fr. Jenkins.Among these are the following:
First, it is part of the role of a university to foster free and open discussion of controversial issues.Second, it is the responsibility of all involved in sponsoring a controversial event to ensure that the presentation has academic merit, multiple viewpoints are heard, appropriate balance among these is maintained, and reasoned and respectful exchangethe hallmark of a genuine universityis fostered.Third, those sponsoring an event must make clear that their sponsorship is not an endorsement of the views presented, and any language or actions suggesting such endorsement must be avoided.Finally, when a significant issue of Catholic teaching is touched on, it is incumbent on us as a Catholic university to ensure that a knowledgeable presentation of Catholic teaching is included.
Recently a student proposal for the performance ofThe Vagina Monologueswas approved by several academic departments and received by the dean of the College of Arts and Letters.The dean has approved a final proposal and, after reviewing it, I am satisfied that the principles of theCommon Proposalare being applied.In particular, after each performance and as part of each academic panel, at least one of the panelists will offer a thorough and sympathetic account of the Catholic tradition in relation to the issues raised in the play. Performances of the play, which will take place in an academic setting, will occur from March 26 to 28.
I am well aware that the performance of this play will upset many.It is particularly painful for me that Bishop John DArcyfor whom I have great respect and affectiondisapproves of my decision.It also pains me to know it will disappoint some very loyal members of the Notre Dame familyalumni who are deeply committed to the Catholic identity of Notre Dame who see the performance of this play on campus as contrary to our Catholic mission.
At the same time, others are upset at the restrictions on this performancethat there will be no fund-raising, that a panel must follow each play and include a sympathetic and thorough presentation of Catholic teaching.
My decision on this matter arises from aconviction that it is an indispensable part of the mission of a Catholic university to provide a forum in which multiple viewpoints are debated in reasoned and respectful exchangealways in dialogue with faith and the Catholic traditioneven around highly controversial topics.Notre Dames policy on controversial events rests on the conviction that truth will emerge from reasoned consideration of issues in dialogue with faith, and that we will educate Catholic leaders not by insulating our students from controversial views, but by engaging these views energetically, in light of Catholic teachings.
While I know the decision is likely to disappoint many, and perhaps satisfy no one fully, it is, in my judgment, the action that best serves the distinctive mission of Notre Dame.