Professor designs homes for people displaced by Hurricane Katrina

Author: Carol C. Bradley

Katrina CottageKatrina Cottage

Designer Marianne Cusato didn’t start the tiny house movement in America, but she does take credit for being somewhat of an influence.

Cusato, a 1997 graduate of Notre Dame’s School of Architecture and associate professor of the practice at Notre Dame since 2014, is the internationally known designer of Katrina Cottages, 308-square-foot homes designed as an alternative to the FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) trailers supplied as emergency housing for victims of 2005’s Hurricane Katrina.

Cusato was invited to participate in the rebuilding after Katrina by a mentor, Andres Duany, American architect, urban planner and founder of the Congress for the New Urbanism, a design movement that promotes the creation of environmentally friendly and walkable mixed-use neighborhoods.

Cusato was singularly well placed to participate in the project. “I’ve always loved travel trailers,” she says. “My grandma had an Airstream, and I have fond memories. My family commercial fished in the summer — living in a travel trailer paid for my undergraduate degree.” Architects receive remuneration and fame in designing spectacular houses and monumental buildings, she notes. “I thought it would be amazing to design travel trailers.”

Duany and his wife, architect and University of Miami architecture professor Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, had been invited by Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour to lead a project to study 11 devastated Gulf Coast towns.

Duany invited Cusato to join a group of 200 architects, including 80 local practitioners, to envision “Katrina Cottages,” alternative housing that could both replace FEMA trailers and be built as permanent homes.They arrived six weeks after the storm, in the middle of October. “We were behind the National Guard barricades,” she says.

Cusato’s vision was of a small cottage that could be built quickly and affordably and could withstand a hurricane, as well as be a beautiful home people would be proud to
live in.

Katrina Cottage PlanKatrina Cottage floor plan

Duany sent Cusato’s quick watercolor sketch of the cottage to the Biloxi newspaper in November. Then came one of those synchronous events that change everything.

In 2006 the International Builders’ Show took place in Orlando, Florida. “Outside the convention center, they had houses built in the parking lot,” Cusato says.

Duany got a call from his public relations agent, whom he shared with Sarah Susanka, architect and bestselling author of “The Not So Big House,” whose philosophy is “build better, not bigger.” Susanka’s group had reserved and paid for a space, but were pulling out. Did Duany have anything from the Mississippi project he’d like to display? He said, “Yes. We’ll build Marianne’s house.” Then he called Cusato.

“I stayed up all weekend preparing the construction drawings” she says, and the cottage was built in record time. “And that’s why you know about Katrina Cottages.”

The Washington Post picked up the story and featured the cottage on the front of the real estate section, with an article titled, “Katrina Cottages vs. the New American Home.”

“We could never have planned it,” Cusato says.

CusatoMarianne Cusato

The 308-square-foot Katrina Cottage design went on to win the Smithsonian Institution’s Cooper-Hewitt Design Museum’s 2006 “People’s Design Award.”

Eventually, Mississippi delivered 2,800 houses inspired by the Katrina Cottage to those who lost their homes in the storm. Louisiana has completed construction of 500 units featuring designs from the Katrina Cottage series.

Why did the Katrina Cottages, and the growing interest in tiny houses, strike such a chord with people? “The interest in tiny houses paralleled the explosion in the size of regular houses,” she says. In 1973, the average size of a home in the U.S. was 1,660 square feet. In 2006, that number had grown to 2,469 square feet.

“McMansions,” generic big luxury homes with no particular architectural style, mass-produced in the late 1980s and 1990s (and derided as “Garage Mahals”) typically had square footage of 3,000 square feet or more. The homes featured multiple bathrooms, four or five bedrooms and lavish interior features.

“The real estate reporter had noted that perhaps it was time for Americans to question how we live and build,” she says. “In 2005 and 2006, there was a feeling that things in the housing market were not right. It was the height of the mortgage mess, ARMs, the building boom. People were being choked by their mortgages. There was an overall awareness that we didn’t need so much space.”

Then in 2008, the mortgage market collapsed.

In Las Vegas — formerly a symbol of affluence and over-the-top homes — unemployment increased to more than 14 percent and the housing market slid into a steep decline. In 2010, a Business Insider feature noted that in Nevada, more than 65 percent of homeowners were underwater on their mortgages — they owed more than their homes were worth. Entire housing developments stood abandoned.

It’s not hard to see why people suddenly were longing for smaller, more affordable homes. The extremeness of tiny houses (with some as small as 80 square feet) and the concomitant popularity of tiny house TV shows she likens to the popularity of the History Channel’s “Ice Road Truckers.”

“There’s pure entertainment in tiny house shows. But gosh, I’d love to escape to Alaska.”
In terms of our homes, what we should be doing is considering what works for us, she says.

“Buyers accept things for retail value (too many bathrooms and expensive amenities) and end up living in homes that don’t meet their needs. A home’s live-in value is greater than its resale value. Instead of resale, think about whether you want to take care of a lawn, and how much time you want to spend commuting to your job before you buy a house.”

Ultimately, it’s not about tiny houses, but houses that feel like home. Today, she notes, Americans are aging. “People want to stay in their homes, but they can’t take care of a home. They’re isolated in the suburbs. Small is the new big. No more McMansions, unaffordable huge houses that are hard to heat in the winter and cool in the summer, in communities that make cars a necessity. You want to love where you live. Choose a place to live, rather than just a house to live in.”

For more information and to see more houses and house plans, visit